Your Business News

Court: Canada’s Excise Act violates Aboriginal rights

February 13, 2024

Authored by RSM Canada LLP

John Greenidge shared this article

ARTICLE | February 13, 2024


This content was originally published in the February 2024 edition of the Canadian Tax Foundation’s newsletter: Canadian Tax Focus. Republished with permission.

Executive summary

In His Majesty the King v. Hunter Montour, Derek White, the Superior Court of Quebec entered a permanent stay of proceedings for the criminal convictions of two members of the Mohawks of the Kahnawà:ke for importing tobacco into Canada without paying duties under the Excise Act, 2001. Section 42 of the Excise Act imposes a duty on imported raw leaf tobacco and tobacco products. The court concluded section 42 unjustifiably infringes both an Aboriginal right to freely pursue economic development and the Covenant Chain. The court characterized the Covenant Chain as an overarching oral meta-treaty -- a historic alliance of peace and friendship between the British and the Haudenosaunee Confederacy (which includes the Mohawk Nation). The court found the legislation had a valid, compelling and substantial objective; however, this did not override the Crown’s obligation to consult under the Covenant Chain. The court also considered the tax to be more than a mere inconvenience to Indigenous persons exercising a constitutionally protected right to freely pursue economic development.

Court: Canada’s Excise Act violates Aboriginal rights

The Superior Court of Quebec has released a landmark decision (His Majesty the King v. Hunter Montour, Derek White, no. 505-01-137394-165; under appeal) entering a permanent stay of proceedings for the criminal convictions of two members of the Mohawks of the Kahnawà:ke for importing tobacco into Canada without paying duties under the Excise Act, 2001. The court’s conclusions could have a wider impact on the entire regime regulating tobacco in this legislation as applied to Indigenous persons.

The Excise Act, 2001 is a legislative and administrative framework for taxing spirits, wine, tobacco, cannabis and vaping products. It provides that only licensed individuals are entitled to possess, sell or purchase raw leaf tobacco that is not packaged and stamped. The minister has broad discretion to issue and refuse the issuance of a new license or to cancel an existing license. Section 42 imposes a duty on imported raw leaf tobacco and tobacco products.

The court concluded section 42 unjustifiably infringes both an Aboriginal right to freely pursue economic development and the Covenant Chain. The court characterized the Covenant Chain as an overarching oral meta-treaty -- a historic alliance of peace and friendship between the British and the Haudenosaunee Confederacy (which includes the Mohawk Nation). The court concluded that the Covenant Chain has protected treaty status under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, with a central component being mutual agreement on trade-related matters.

The court’s recognition of the broad right to freely pursue economic development is important. Historically, the Supreme Court of Canada has interpreted protected rights under section 35 narrowly, specific to the group asserting the right and centered on practices, traditions, and customs, that existed before colonial contact. The court departed from stare decisis in formulating the right to freely pursue economic development because of a development that fundamentally shifted the parameters of debate: Canada’s passage into law of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. This declaration recognizes minimum, collective rights of Indigenous peoples such as the right to self-government, to engage freely in traditions, and to freely pursue economic development. The court noted that this right is infringed by several elements of the regulatory regime on tobacco trade in the Excise Act, 2001, especially the broad discretion of the minister to administer licenses. The court also considered the tax to be more than a mere inconvenience to Indigenous persons exercising a constitutionally protected right.

The court concluded that the legislation serves a valid, compelling and substantial objective – to improve the health of Canadians by reducing smoking. However, this did not override the Crown’s obligation to consult under the Covenant Chain. Although the Department of Finance and Canada Revenue Agency met with other players in the tobacco industry, there was no discussion with the Mohawks of Kahnawà:ke regarding the application of the new tobacco regulatory scheme. Evidence before the court–such as testimony by a member of the Kahnawà:ke Band Council in the 1990s–indicated that the regulation and taxation of tobacco sale and supply was known to be a live issue at the time the Excise Act, 2001 was under consideration. The parties have an obligation to discuss live issues. Further, the court noted that, “The absence of consultation blocked the possibility of exploring avenues that might have led to achieving the government's goal, while limiting the infringement of an Aboriginal right.” As a result, the infringements of the Aboriginal and treaty rights were not justified.

Let's Talk!

Call us at 1 855 363 3526 or fill out the form below and we'll contact you to discuss your specific situation.

  • Topic Name:
  • Should be Empty:

This article was written by Simon Townsend, Chetna Thapar and originally appeared on 2024-02-13 RSM Canada, and is available online at https://rsmcanada.com/insights/tax-alerts/2024/canadas-excise-act-violates-aboriginal-rights.html.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM Canada guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM Canada assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

RSM Canada Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM Canada Operations ULC, RSM Canada LLP and certain of their affiliates (“RSM Canada”). RSM Canada Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each are separate and independent from RSM Canada. RSM Canada LLP is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms. Members of RSM Canada Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM Canada but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmcanada.com/aboutus for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International. The RSM trademark is used under license by RSM Canada. RSM Canada Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM Canada.

FCR a proud member of RSM Canada Alliance, a premier affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms across North America. RSM Canada Alliance provides our firm with access to resources of RSM, the leading provider of audit, tax and consulting services focused on the middle market. RSM Canada LLP is a licensed CPA firm and the Canadian member of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms with more than 43,000 people in over 120 countries.

Our membership in RSM Canada Alliance has elevated our capabilities in the marketplace, helping to differentiate our firm from the competition while allowing us to maintain our independence and entrepreneurial culture. We have access to a valuable peer network of like-sized firms as well as a broad range of tools, expertise, and technical resources.

For more information on how FCR can assist you, please call us at 1 855 363 3526

Important Notice:

FCR will now redirect you to CCH Portal where your FCR Client Portal login is located.

Share This